On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 16:18, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 8:55 AM, Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> wrote: >> Hmm. I don't like those names at all :( > > I agree. I don't think your original names are bad, as long as > they're well-documented. I sympathize with Simon's desire to make it > clear that these use the replication framework, but I really don't > want the command names to be that long.
Actually, after some IM chats, I think pg_streamrecv should be renamed, probably to pg_walstream (or pg_logstream, but pg_walstream is a lot more specific than that) -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
