On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 16:20 +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote: > On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 16:18, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 8:55 AM, Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> > > wrote: > >> Hmm. I don't like those names at all :( > > > > I agree. I don't think your original names are bad, as long as > > they're well-documented. I sympathize with Simon's desire to make it > > clear that these use the replication framework, but I really don't > > want the command names to be that long. > > Actually, after some IM chats, I think pg_streamrecv should be > renamed, probably to pg_walstream (or pg_logstream, but pg_walstream > is a lot more specific than that)
pg_stream_log pg_stream_backup ? -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/books/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
