Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> writes:
>>> Actually, after some IM chats, I think pg_streamrecv should be
>>> renamed, probably to pg_walstream (or pg_logstream, but pg_walstream
>>> is a lot more specific than that)
>> pg_stream_log
>> pg_stream_backup
> Those seem better.
> Tom, would those solve your concerns about it being clear which side
> they are on? Or do you think you'd still risk reading them as the
> sending side?
It's still totally unclear what they do. How about "pg_receive_log"
etc?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
