Tom Lane wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > > On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 11:47 AM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > >> It seems like /contrib would be more natural, no? ?/bin seems like > >> overkill because most people will not want to run it. ?Most of /contrib > >> is installed already by installers, I think. > > > At least on Red Hat, it is packaged separately. > > On Red Hat, it is not packaged at all (at least not by me), and won't > be unless it goes into contrib. I don't believe it belongs in the > base package. > > Also, it's not going to get packaged at all unless it gets renamed to > something less generic, maybe pg_test_fsync; I'm not going to risk the > oppobrium of sticking something named "test_fsync" into /usr/bin. > Moving to contrib would be a good opportunity to fix the name.
Agreed on the need for a name change. /contrib or /bin are fine with me. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
