On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 3:52 AM, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > I needed something to test the FDW API patch with, and didn't want to get > involved in the COPY API changes, and also wanted to have something that > needs real connection management and can push down quals. So I updated the > postgresql_fdw patch to work with the latest FDW patch. > > Here. It's a bit of a mess, but it works for simple queries.. > > It requires a small change to the FDW api > (fdw-api-add-serverid-userid.patch). I added server oid and user oid fields > to the FdwPlan - that seems like basic information that most FDW's will > need, so it seems awkward to require the FDW to wrap them in Const nodes and > a List. > > These are also available in my git repository at > git://git.postgresql.org/git/users/heikki/postgres.git, branches fdw2 and > postgresql_fdw.
So how close are we to getting the core support committed? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers