On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 9:06 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 8:13 AM, Shigeru HANADA > <han...@metrosystems.co.jp> wrote: >> >> On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 20:30:05 +0900 >> Shigeru HANADA <han...@metrosystems.co.jp> wrote: >> >>> >>> On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 11:33:25 -0500 >>> Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > Is anyone actually working on a new version of this patch sufficiently >>> > rapidly that we can expect a new version in the next day or two? >>> > >>> > If not, I think we mark this one Returned with Feedback and revisit it >>> > for 9.2. >>> >>> I'm working on it. >>> >>> Fixes for new FDW API have been done, but there are some problems in >>> SQL generation codes, such as SELECT clause optimization (omitting >>> unused column from SELECT clause). It would take a while, but I'll >>> post revised version of the patch tomorrow. >> >> Attached is a revised version of postgresql_fdw patch. I started from >> Heikki's latest patch, and modified some points: >> >> 1) use new FDW API >> 2) use EXTENSION framework >> 3) SELECT clause optimization (use NULL for unused columns) >> 4) show remote query in EXPLAIN output >> >> WHERE clause pushdown was implemented in Heikki's version, so I didn't >> touch around it. Now I'm working on cost estimation and connection >> management, but they would need some more work. > > So this is still work-in-progress? When do you expect a final version?
Since it sounds like this still needs more work, I'm going to mark it Returned with Feedback. I hope we integrate this during the 9.2 cycle. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
