* Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote: > In particular, getting rid of use of OpenSSL would not be sufficient > to satisfy the most rabid GPL partisans that we were in compliance.
I've never heard anyone argue that position, don't believe anyone would,
and certainly don't agree with it.
> Whereas, if we get rid of readline, it no longer matters whether we
> depend on OpenSSL.
I agree w/ the other responses to this, in particular from Stark, but I
just wanted to point out that we're much more likely to come across
other GPL-licensed things that we want to support linking against (and
who might link against us..) than OpenSSL-type-licensed things..
Thanks,
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
