Greg Stark wrote: > On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 1:53 AM, Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> wrote: > > I agree w/ the other responses to this, in particular from Stark, but I > > just wanted to point out that we're much more likely to come across > > other GPL-licensed things that we want to support linking against (and > > who might link against us..) than OpenSSL-type-licensed things.. > > Well for what it's worth we want to support both. At least the project > philosophy has been that commercial derivatives are expected and > acceptable so things like EDB's products, or Greenplums, or for that > matter Pokertracker's all include other proprietary source that of > course has restrictive licenses ("OpenSSL-type-licensed" except even > *more* restrictive).
That might not be possible of libreadline makes psql require a GPL license. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers