Joshua D. Drake wrote: > On Wed, 2011-02-16 at 20:53 -0500, Stephen Frost wrote: > > * Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote: > > > In particular, getting rid of use of OpenSSL would not be sufficient > > > to satisfy the most rabid GPL partisans that we were in compliance. > > > > I've never heard anyone argue that position, don't believe anyone would, > > and certainly don't agree with it. > > Yeah I am not sure I can buy Tom's argument here. The GPL is fairly > clear and is compatible with the BSD/Postgres license.
Compatible if you want the result to be GPL, yes. I hardly see that as desirable. I am unclear what is being said above. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
