On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 11:35:30AM -0800, David Wheeler wrote:
> On Feb 24, 2011, at 10:43 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> >> The best idea I have at the moment is to spell out "data modifying
> >> command" (or "statement") rather than relying on the acronym.
> >> In the code, we could change hasDmlWith to hasModifyingWith, for
> >> example.  The error messages could read like
> >>        data-modifying statement in WITH is not allowed in a view
> >> 
> >> Comments?
> > 
> > Great idea.  I had the same complaint when I looked at this patch
> > a year ago, but didn't come up with nearly as good an idea as to
> > what to do about it.
> I like "statement" better than "command," too, but love the acronym
> DMC. As in, "you want to Run [a] DMC." ;-P

Hit it, Run! ;)

David Fetter <da...@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778  AIM: dfetter666  Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter      XMPP: david.fet...@gmail.com
iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to