Marko Tiikkaja <marko.tiikk...@cs.helsinki.fi> writes:
> On 2011-02-28 9:36 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> OK, so the intent is that in all cases, we just advance CID and don't
>> take a new snapshot between queries that were generated (by rule
>> expansion) from a single original parsetree? But we still take a new
>> snap between original parsetrees? Works for me.
> Exactly.
OK, applied with corrections (I didn't think either the spi.c or
functions.c changes were quite right).
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
