Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> So: exactly what is the intended behavioral change as of now, and what >> is the argument supporting that change?
> IIUC, this is the result of countless rounds of communal bikeshedding around: Quite :-(. But I'm not sure where the merry-go-round stopped. > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-07/msg01256.php Please notice that the very terms of discussion in that message depend on a view of wCTEs that has got nothing to do with what was applied. I'm afraid that the goals of this patch might be similarly obsolete. I definitely don't want to apply the patch in a hurry just because we're down to the end of the commitfest. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers