On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 7:40 PM, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 15:25 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote: > >> No, I've never wished wait-forever option for now. I'd like to make >> the primary work alone when there is no connected standby, for >> high-availability. > > allow_standalone_primary seems to need to be better through than it is > now, yet neither of us think its worth having. > > If the people that want it can think it through a little better then it > might make this release, but I propose to remove it from this current > patch to allow us to commit with greater certainty and fewer bugs.
+1 to remove the "wait-forever" behavior and the parameter for 9.1. Regards, -- Fujii Masao NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION NTT Open Source Software Center -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
