On 2011-03-02 21:26, Kevin Grittner wrote:
I think including "synchronous" is OK as long as it's properly
qualified. Off-hand thoughts in no particular order:
semi-synchronous
conditionally synchronous
synchronous with automatic failover to standalone
It would be good to name the concept equal to how other DBMSses call it,
if they have a similar concept - don't know if Mysql's semisynchronous
replication is the same, but after a quick read it sounds like it does.
regards,
Yeb Havinga
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
