On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote: > Robert Haas <[email protected]> writes: >> Specifically, if we're not going to remove write location, then I >> think we need to apply something like the attached. > >> while (walrcv_receive(0, &type, &buf, &len)) >> XLogWalRcvProcessMsg(type, buf, len); > >> + /* Let the master know that we received some data. */ >> + XLogWalRcvSendReply(); > > What if we didn't actually receive any new data?
The portion of the code immediately preceding what's included in the diff guards against that, and there is a second guard in XLogWalRcvSendReply(). -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
