On lör, 2011-03-26 at 09:41 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > You can't be guaranteed that they won't standardize something > incompatible no matter what we do. We could choose to do it as you've > proposed and they could then standardize some weird syntax - the => is > a fairly relevant example of exactly that.
The matter of how to resolve SQL parameter names is already standardized. See clause on <identifier chain>. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
