On Tuesday, April 26, 2011 03:21:05 PM Radosław Smogura wrote: > On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 14:25:10 +0200, Andres Freund wrote: > > On Tuesday, April 26, 2011 01:59:45 PM Radosław Smogura wrote: > >> I didn't followed this topic carefully, so sorry If I wrote > >> > >> something > >> > >> that was written, but I thought about following approach at least > >> > >> for > >> > >> message sending, etc.: > >> > >> 1. When initializing MemoryContext (pool) give one parameter that > >> > >> will > >> > >> be stack size. Stack is addition to normal operations. > > > > You can't allocate memory on the stack and return that. > > > > Andres > > I didn't wrote allocate on stack. I thought about preallocate n bytes > chunk for stack-like memory but without popping. The implementation already does something like that.
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
