On 04/28/2011 12:44 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan<[email protected]> writes:What I'm thinking of doing is to set up something like: #define PG_PRINTF_CHECK __printf__BTW, gcc 2.95.3 documents "printf", and not "__printf__". Suggest not including the underscores, since that's apparently a johnny-come-lately spelling. It's not like any of this construct is even faintly portable to non-gcc compilers anyway ...
Yeah, I think that the underscore variants got added because of cases like ours where printf is sometimes defined as a macro. I'll just need to make sure that this gets set before there's any possibility of that happening.
cheers andrew -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
