Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> writes:
> Yeah, I think that the underscore variants got added because of cases
> like ours where printf is sometimes defined as a macro. I'll just need
> to make sure that this gets set before there's any possibility of that
> happening.
The existing code would already be broken if that were the case,
so I see no need to worry.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
