On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Kevin Grittner <kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov> wrote: >> I wish the fix will be back-patched in 8.3, too. > > I guess the question is whether this is a bug which causes more > problems than the potential breakage which might ensue for someone > who relies on the current behavior. How sure can you be that nobody > relies on seeing those messages? No information (like a history of > database start times) is lost without these entries?
I think Tom had the right idea upthread: what we should do is make the "-s" option to pg_ctl suppress these messages (as it does with similar messages on Linux). Removing them altogether seems like overkill, for the reasons you mention. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers