On fre, 2011-06-24 at 18:02 +0100, Peter Geoghegan wrote: > I'm very encouraged by this - Clang is snapping at the heels of GCC > here. I'd really like to see Clang as a better supported compiler,
We have a build farm member for Clang: http://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_history.pl?nm=smew&br=HEAD That doesn't capture the compile time issues that you described, but several other issues that caused the builds to fail altogether have been worked out recently, and I'd consider clang 2.9+ to be fully supported as of PG 9.1. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
