On 25 June 2011 00:27, Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> wrote: > On fre, 2011-06-24 at 18:02 +0100, Peter Geoghegan wrote: >> I'm very encouraged by this - Clang is snapping at the heels of GCC >> here. I'd really like to see Clang as a better supported compiler, > > We have a build farm member for Clang: > http://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_history.pl?nm=smew&br=HEAD > > That doesn't capture the compile time issues that you described, but > several other issues that caused the builds to fail altogether have been > worked out recently, and I'd consider clang 2.9+ to be fully supported > as of PG 9.1.
I did see the D_GNU_SOURCE issue that you described a while back with 2.8. My bleeding edge Fedora 15 system's yum repository only has 2.8, for some reason. I'm glad that you feel we're ready to officially support Clang - should this be in the 9.1 release notes? Anyway, since the problem has been narrowed to a specific compiler flag, and we have a good test case, I'm optimistic that the bug can be fixed quickly. -- Peter Geoghegan http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
