On Thu, 2011-06-30 at 15:09 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote: <snip>
> I don't think we have a policy for this, but I have done it for some > time now and nobody has complained, so I sort of assumed it was okay. > Besides, some of the people pouring the money in does care about it; > moreover, it provides a little incentive for other companies that > might also be in a position to fund development but lack the "peer > approval" of the idea, or a final little push. > > So what's the general opinion here? +1 for adding sponsor name to the commit message. It will encourage companies more. -- Devrim GÜNDÜZ Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer Community: devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr http://www.gunduz.org Twitter: http://twitter.com/devrimgunduz
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
