Excerpts from Jeff Davis's message of vie jul 08 00:58:20 -0400 2011: > On Thu, 2011-07-07 at 12:36 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > > I think it's probably too late to go fiddling with the behavior of 9.0 > > at this point. If we change the text of error messages, there is a > > chance that it might break applications; it would also require those > > messages to be re-translated, and I don't think the issue is really > > important enough to justify a change. > > Good point on the error messages -- I didn't really think of that as a > big deal. > > > I am happy to see us document > > it better, though, since it's pretty clear that there is more > > likelihood of hitting that error than we might have suspected at the > > outset. > > Doc patch attached, but I'm not attached to the wording. Remember that > we only need to update the 9.0 docs, I don't think you want to apply > this to master (though I'm not sure how this kind of thing is normally > handled).
Is this really a good idea? I think the note should still be there in 9.1 and beyond (with the version applicability note of course) -- Álvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
