On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Jeff Davis <pg...@j-davis.com> wrote: > On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 11:58 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: >> I'm OK with adding a note either to the 9.0 docs only (which means it >> might be missed by a 9.0 user who only looks at the current docs) or >> with adding a note to all versions mentioning the difference in >> behavior with 9.0, but I'm not really sure which way to go with it. >> Or we could just not do anything at all. Anyone else have an opinion? > > It seems to be somewhat of a burden to carry a version-specific note > indefinitely... more clutter than helpful. So I'd vote for just changing > the 9.0 docs. > > Or, we could add the 9.0-specific note to 9.0 and 9.1 docs, but leave it > out of 'master'. That way it sticks around for a while but we don't have > to remember to remove it later.
Having thought about this a bit further, I'm coming around to the view that if it isn't worth adding this in master, it's not worth adding at all. I just don't think it's going to get any visibility as a back-branch only doc patch. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
