On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 12:58 AM, Jeff Davis <pg...@j-davis.com> wrote: > On Thu, 2011-07-07 at 12:36 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: >> I think it's probably too late to go fiddling with the behavior of 9.0 >> at this point. If we change the text of error messages, there is a >> chance that it might break applications; it would also require those >> messages to be re-translated, and I don't think the issue is really >> important enough to justify a change. > > Good point on the error messages -- I didn't really think of that as a > big deal. > >> I am happy to see us document >> it better, though, since it's pretty clear that there is more >> likelihood of hitting that error than we might have suspected at the >> outset. > > Doc patch attached, but I'm not attached to the wording. Remember that > we only need to update the 9.0 docs, I don't think you want to apply > this to master (though I'm not sure how this kind of thing is normally > handled).
I'm wondering if we might want to call this out with a <note> or similar... especially if we're only going to put it into the 9.0 docs. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
