On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 11:27 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
>> On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>> The thing that was bizarre about the one instance in the buildfarm was
>>> that the error was persistent, ie, once a session had failed all its
>>> subsequent attempts to access pg_class failed too.
>> I was thinking more along the lines of a failure while processing a
>> sinval message emitted by the REINDEX.  The sinval message doesn't get
>> fully processed and therefore we get confused about what the
>> relfilenode is for pg_class.  If that happened for any other relation,
>> we could recover by scanning pg_class.  But if it happens for pg_class
>> or pg_class_oid_index, we're toast, because we can't scan them without
>> knowing what relfilenode to open.
> Well, no, because the ScanPgRelation call is not failing internally.
> It's performing a seqscan of pg_class and not finding a matching tuple.

SnapshotNow race?

Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to