On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 10:36 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Anyway, I won't stand in the way of the patch as long as it's modified > to limit the number of values considered for any one character position > to something reasonably small.
I think that limit in both the old and new code is 1, except that the new code does it more efficiently. Am I confused? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
