On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 5:16 AM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyot...@oss.ntt.co.jp> wrote: > Can I have another chance to show the another version of the > patch according to the above?
You can always post a new version of any patch. I think what you need to focus on is cleaning up the coding style to match PG project standards. In particular, you need to fix your brace positioning and the way function declarations are laid out. Someone will have to do that before this is committed, and ideally that person should be you rather than, say, me. :-) It would be good to fix the memcpy() issue Tom found too, and make a careful examination of the code for anything else that can be tidied up or made more bulletproof. It seems like we are getting close to agreement on the basic behavior, so that is good. We can always fine-tune that later; that shouldn't be much work. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
