On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> writes: >> ISTM that writing an invalid-page table to the disk for every restartpoints >> is >> better approach. > > I still say that's uncalled-for overkill. The invalid-page table is not > necessary for recovery, it's only a debugging cross-check.
If so, there is no risk even if the invalid-page table is lost and the check is skipped unexpectedly? Regards, -- Fujii Masao NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION NTT Open Source Software Center -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
