Robert Haas wrote: > On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Kevin Grittner > <kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov> wrote: > > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> The funny thing is that I've been thinking all of these months > >> about how convenient it is that we defined WAL_DEBUG in debug > >> builds > > > > IMO, --enable-debug should not do anything but include debugging > > symbols. ?The ability to get a useful stack trace from a production > > crash, without compromising performance, is just too important by > > itself to consider conditioning any other behavior on it. > > So, should I go revert this change in head and 9.1, or does anyone > else want to argue for Heikki's position that we should just leave it > on, on the theory that it's too cheap to matter?
I would just fix it in head. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers