Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 4:06 PM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: >> I would just fix it in head.
> That just seems weird. Either it's cheap enough not to matter (in > which case there's no reason to revert that change at all) or it's > expensive enough to matter (in which case presumably we don't want to > leave it on in 9.1 for the 5 years or so it remains a supported > release). It needs to be reverted. I don't understand why you didn't do that instantly upon the mistake being pointed out to you. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers