On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 09:17, Greg Stark <st...@mit.edu> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 5:45 PM, Alex Hunsaker <bada...@gmail.com> wrote: >> If I find the time maybe Ill submit something along these lines for >> the next commit fest. >> > > So i just picked up the non-inherited constraints patch and quickly > ran into the same problem and found this thread. > > I think it makes sense to hold off on this patch until these issues > are resolved. Because we really do need to test the cases when adding > or removing child tables that have constraints with the same name as > non-inherited parent tables. And I'm not sure what will happen in > these cases once these issues are resolved.
Doesn't someone just need to commit Roberts patch? I suppose it could do with a better review than my eyeballing... Maybe thats where the hang up is? -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers