On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Alex Hunsaker <bada...@gmail.com> wrote: >> So i just picked up the non-inherited constraints patch and quickly >> ran into the same problem and found this thread. >> >> I think it makes sense to hold off on this patch until these issues >> are resolved. Because we really do need to test the cases when adding >> or removing child tables that have constraints with the same name as >> non-inherited parent tables. And I'm not sure what will happen in >> these cases once these issues are resolved. > > Doesn't someone just need to commit Roberts patch?
Yeah, I've just been mostly AFK for ~53 hours. It's committed now. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers