> As I suggested in the reply to Simon, I think that the change of FPW > should be WAL-logged separately from that of HS parameters. ISTM > packing them in one WAL record makes XLogReportParameters() > quite confusing. Thought?
I updated a patch for what you have suggested (that the change of FPW should be WAL-logged separately from that of HS parameters). I want to base on this patch if there are no other opinions. Regards. -------------------------------------------- Jun Ishizuka NTT Software Corporation TEL：045-317-7018 E-Mail: [email protected] --------------------------------------------
standby_online_backup_09base-07fpw.patch
Description: Binary data
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
