Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > My list of things to do included optimising > GetRunningTransactionLocks(), run once per checkpoint.
> I was thinking I needed to try harder to avoid acquiring LWlocks on > all the lock partitions. > ISTM that I don't need to do this - lwlocks on lock partitions are > almost never contended now, so this should go much faster than before. > Any thoughts? Do we think it would benefit from further tweaking? > I'll assume not unless I hear from somebody with a different idea. ISTM that some evidence of a problem should be acquired before expending sweat on a solution ... have you seen evidence that this creates any real issue? regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers