On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 2:36 AM, Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> If we introduce "walrestore" process, pg_standby seems no longer useful. > We should get rid of it? Removing things too quickly can cause problems. There's no harm done by keeping it a while longer. I agree it should go, just want to be absolutely clear that its no longer needed for any use case. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
