On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 12:42 PM, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Any standby can now become a sender node, so the meaning in that case > would be the same. That takes a little time to get your head around, > and I'm not used to it myself yet.
I think a new parameter will be more clear, even if in practice the difference is fairly thin. >>> Which do we prefer "DeArchiver", "Restore process", or "WALFileReceiver". >> >> My personal preference would be restore process, since we already use >> the name restore_command. > > Restore process, with file called restore.c in src/backend/postmaster > (or src/backend/replication?) Yeah, that works. I'd go for postmaster over replication, for parallelism. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
