Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> writes: > If we introduce "walrestore" process, pg_standby seems no longer useful.
pg_standby is one possible restore_command, right? I had understood that walrestore would be the process that cares for running that command, not another implementation of it. That said, I would really like us to provide a default restore command, so if you had any intend of handling the restoring command in the walrestore process, by all means, go ahead :) Regards, -- Dimitri Fontaine http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
