On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 08:11 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > It needs to return FALSE, actually. After further reading I realized > that you have that behavior hard-wired into the range GiST routines, > and it's silly to make the stand-alone versions of the function act > differently.
Good point. That makes sense to me.
Regards,
Jeff Davis
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
