On Mon, November 14, 2011 19:43, Tom Lane wrote: > Jeff Davis <pg...@j-davis.com> writes: >> On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 08:11 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > > While thinking about this ... would it be sensible for range_lower and > range_upper to return NULL instead of throwing an exception for empty or > infinite ranges? As with these comparison functions, throwing an error > seems like a fairly unpleasant definition to work with in practice. >
+1 much better, IMHO. Erik Rijkers -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
