Pavel Stehule wrote: >> One thing I forgot to mention: >> I thought there was a consensus to add a WITH() or OPTIONS() clause >> to pass options to the checker function: >> http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/12568.1322669...@sss.pgh.pa.us >> >> I think this should be there so that the API does not have to be >> changed in the future. >>
> there is just one question - how propagate options to check functions > > I am thinking about third parameter - probably text array Either that, or couldn't you pass an option List as data type "internal"? I don't know what is most natural or convenient. Yours, Laurenz Albe -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
