Pavel Stehule wrote:
>> One thing I forgot to mention:
>> I thought there was a consensus to add a WITH() or OPTIONS() clause
>> to pass options to the checker function:
>> I think this should be there so that the API does not have to be
>> changed in the future.

> there is just one question - how propagate options to check functions
> I am thinking about third parameter - probably text array

Either that, or couldn't you pass an option List as data type "internal"?

I don't know what is most natural or convenient.

Laurenz Albe

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to