2011/12/13 Albe Laurenz <laurenz.a...@wien.gv.at>:
> Pavel Stehule wrote:
>>> One thing I forgot to mention:
>>> I thought there was a consensus to add a WITH() or OPTIONS() clause
>>> to pass options to the checker function:
>>> http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/12568.1322669...@sss.pgh.pa.us
>>> I think this should be there so that the API does not have to be
>>> changed in the future.
>> there is just one question - how propagate options to check functions
>> I am thinking about third parameter - probably text array
> Either that, or couldn't you pass an option List as data type "internal"?

this is question - internal is most simply solution, but then we
cannot to call check function directly



> I don't know what is most natural or convenient.
> Yours,
> Laurenz Albe

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to