On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 14:01, Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> wrote: > > Excerpts from Alex Hunsaker's message of vie dic 16 17:50:12 -0300 2011: >> >> On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 12:06, Alvaro Herrera >> <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> wrote: >> >> > Yeah. Nikhil, Alex, this is the merged patch. Have a look that it >> > still works for you (particularly the pg_dump bits) and I'll commit it. >> > I adjusted the regression test a bit too. >> >> Other than the version checks seem to be off by one looks fine. > > Uhm ... you're right that convalidated is present in 9.1 [...] So I > don't think we really need to add a separate branch for 9.1 here, but it > certainly needs a comment improvement.
Hrm... What am I missing? $ inh_v4/bin/psql -c 'select version();' -d test version --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PostgreSQL 9.1.0 on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (GCC) 4.6.1 20110819 (prerelease), 64-bit (1 row) $ inh_v4/bin/pg_dump test pg_dump: SQL command failed pg_dump: Error message from server: ERROR: column "conisonly" does not exist LINE 1: ...aintdef(oid) AS consrc, conislocal, convalidated, conisonly ... ^ pg_dump: The command was: SELECT tableoid, oid, conname, pg_catalog.pg_get_constraintdef(oid) AS consrc, conislocal, convalidated, conisonly FROM pg_catalog.pg_constraint WHERE conrelid = '237964'::pg_catalog.oid AND contype = 'c' ORDER BY conname -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers