"Albe Laurenz" <laurenz.a...@wien.gv.at> wrote: > I read the example carefully, and it seems to me that it is > necessary for the read-only transaction (T3) to be SERIALIZABLE so > that T1 is aborted and the state that T3 saw remains valid. Correct. > If I understand right, I agree with your correction. :-) -Kevin
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
