2012/02/21 0:58 "Kevin Grittner" <kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov>: > > "Albe Laurenz" <laurenz.a...@wien.gv.at> wrote: > > > I read the example carefully, and it seems to me that it is > > necessary for the read-only transaction (T3)v to be SERIALIZABLE so > > that T1 is aborted and the state that T3 saw remains valid. > > Correct. Hm, agreed that isolation levels < REPEATABLE READ are not sufficient for pgsql_fdw's usage. I'll examine the example and fix pgsql_fdw.
Thanks.
