2012/02/21 0:58 "Kevin Grittner" <kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov>:
> "Albe Laurenz" <laurenz.a...@wien.gv.at> wrote:
> > I read the example carefully, and it seems to me that it is
> > necessary for the read-only transaction (T3)v to be SERIALIZABLE so
> > that T1 is aborted and the state that T3 saw remains valid.
> Correct.
Hm, agreed that isolation levels < REPEATABLE READ are not sufficient for
pgsql_fdw's usage.  I'll examine the example and fix pgsql_fdw.


Reply via email to