Josh Berkus <> writes:
>> It would probably be prudent to concentrate on getting the core
>> infrastructure committed first. That way, we at least know that if
>> this doesn't get into 9.2, we can work on getting it into 9.3 knowing
>> that once committed, people won't have to wait over a year at the very

> I don't see why we can't commit the whole thing.  This is way more ready
> for prime-time than checksums.

We'll get to it in due time.  In case you haven't noticed, there's a lot
of stuff in this commitfest.  And I don't follow the logic that says
that because Simon is trying to push through a not-ready-for-commit
patch we should drop our standards for other patches.

                        regards, tom lane

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to