Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> We'll get to it in due time. In case you haven't noticed, there's a lot >> of stuff in this commitfest. And I don't follow the logic that says >> that because Simon is trying to push through a not-ready-for-commit >> patch we should drop our standards for other patches.
> I don't follow that logic either, but I also feel like this CommitFest > is dragging on and on. Unless you -- or someone -- are prepared to > devote a lot more time to this, "due time" is not going to arrive any > time in the forseeable future. We're currently making progress at a > rate of maybe 4 patches a week, at which rate we're going to finish > this CommitFest in May. And that might be generous, because we've > been disproportionately knocking off the easy ones. Do we have any > kind of a plan for, I don't know, bringing this to closure on some > reasonable time frame? Well, personally I was paying approximately zero attention to the commitfest for most of February, because I was occupied with trying to get back-branch releases out, as well as some non-Postgres matters. CF items are now back to the head of my to-do queue; you may have noticed that I'm busy with Korotkov's array stats patch. I do intend to take this one up in due course (although considering it's not marked Ready For Committer yet, I don't see that it deserves time ahead of those that are). As for when we'll be done with the CF, I dunno, but since it's the last one for this release cycle I didn't think that we'd be arbitrarily closing it on any particular schedule. It'll be done when it's done. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers