> We'll get to it in due time. In case you haven't noticed, there's a lot > of stuff in this commitfest. And I don't follow the logic that says > that because Simon is trying to push through a not-ready-for-commit > patch we should drop our standards for other patches.
What I'm pointing out is that Peter shouldn't even be talking about cutting functionality from an apparently-ready-for-committer patch in order to yield way to a patch about which people are still arguing specification. This is exactly why I'm not keen on checksums for 9.2. We've reached the point where the attention on the checksum patch is pushing aside other patches which are more ready and have had more work. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
