On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 08:48:07PM +0000, Peter Geoghegan wrote: > On 19 March 2012 19:55, Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> wrote: > > If someone wanted to bite the bullet and do the work, I think we could > > move to a Perl/TAP-based test suite (not pgTAP, but Perl and some fairly > > standard Test::* modules) and reduce that useless reformatting work and > > test more interesting things. Just a thought ... > > I think that that is a good idea. However, I am not a Perl hacker, > though this is the second time that that has left me at a disadvantage > when working on Postgres, so I think it's probably time to learn a > certain amount.
My blog entry on this topic might be helpful: http://momjian.us/main/blogs/pgblog/2008.html#October_4_2008_2 -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers